• Super Admin
• 08 Mar, 2026

SERAP filed the suit at the ECOWAS Court of Justice. EXCLUSIVE: Federal High Court Chief Judge Tsoho operates undeclared accounts, violates code of conduct lawSPECIAL REPORT: How gas flaring turns Akwa Ibom's oil communities into a furnace SPECIAL REPORT: Edo's N14. 15 billion extra-budgetary spending raises questions about fiscal discipline under OkpebholoAkwa Ibom's N2.53 trillion revenue in 32 months under Eno surpasses its previous eight-year earningsN210trn mirage: How Wadada's claim on NNPCL collapses under simple arithmetic, By Kingsley Ade AdegbiteEXCLUSIVE: FG panel nails Uche Nnaji, confirms ex-minister forged UNN certificate 15 billion extra-budgetary spending raises questions about fiscal discipline under OkpebholoAkwa Ibom's N2.53 trillion revenue in 32 months under Eno surpasses its previous eight-year earningsN210trn mirage: How Wadada's claim on NNPCL collapses under simple arithmetic, By Kingsley Ade AdegbiteThe Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project . The Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project has filed a lawsuit against the government of President Bola Tinubu over "the failure to withdraw the patently unlawful mass phone-tapping rules known as 'Lawful Interception of Communications Regulations, 2019.'" The lawsuit followed allegations by the former Kaduna State Governor, Nasir El-Rufai, that the National Security Adviser , Nuhu Ribadu's phone conversation was intercepted. Mr El-Rufai reportedly claimed, "The NSA's call was tapped. They do that to our calls too, and we heard him saying they should arrest me." In the suit number ECW/CCJ/APP/11/26 filed last Friday at the ECOWAS Community Court of Justice, Abuja, SERAP is seeking: "a declaration that the failure of the government to withdraw the Interception of Communications Regulations is unlawful and a violation of Nigeria's international human rights obligations." SERAP is seeking "a declaration that the failure of the government to withdraw the Interception of Communications Regulations constitutes an official endorsement of unlawful mass phone-tapping rules, as the Regulations are patently unlawful, and violate the rule of law, democratic principles, and the right to privacy." SERAP is also seeking "an order directing and compelling the Nigerian government to immediately withdraw the Interception of Communications Regulations, and to commence a legislative process to ensure that any interception regulations are in conformity with Nigeria's international human rights obligations." In the suit, SERAP is arguing that "the Regulations establish a sweeping mass phone-tapping regime that violates Nigerians' constitutionally and internationally guaranteed human rights, including to privacy and freedom of expression." SERAP is also arguing that, "Where powers affecting fundamental human rights are exercised in secrecy and concentrated in political authorities without independent supervision, the risks of arbitrariness are substantial." According to SERAP, "Surveillance measures that lack strict necessity, proportionality and independent judicial oversight can easily be weaponised against political opponents, journalists, civil society actors and election observers." SERAP is also arguing that, "The Regulations also raise serious concerns as Nigeria approaches the 2027 general elections. Broad and weakly safeguarded interception powers create a real risk of abuse during politically sensitive periods." The suit filed on behalf of SERAP by its lawyers, Kolawole Oluwadare, Oluwakemi Oni, Valentina Adegoke and Maryam Mumuni, read in part: "Secret surveillance and bulk data collection create a permanent risk of misuse, profiling and abuse, particularly given the formidable technologies available to state authorities." "The mere retention or storage of personal data relating to an individual's private life constitutes an interference with this right -- whether or not the data is subsequently accessed or used." "In an electoral climate, even the perception that private communications are being monitored can chill political organising, investigative reporting and voter mobilisation." "The Regulations grant overly broad and vague powers to intercept communications on grounds such as 'national security,' 'economic wellbeing,' and 'public emergency,' without adequate judicial safeguards, independent oversight, transparency, or effective remedies." "Free and fair elections depend on confidential communications, protected journalistic sources and open democratic debate. Any misuse of intercepted data for intimidation, political advantage or disinformation would fundamentally undermine Nigerians' right to political participation and electoral integrity." "As 2027 approaches, interception powers must be narrowly defined, subject to prior independent judicial authorisation and backed by effective remedies. Without robust safeguards, these Regulations risk threatening privacy rights, freedom of expression and the credibility of Nigeria's democratic process." "Any restriction on the right to privacy must strictly comply with the principles of legality, necessity and proportionality. The Regulations fail all three tests." "The Regulations normalise surveillance as routine state practice and invert the presumption of privacy by criminalising interception except as permitted under the Regulations." "The Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights has made it unequivocally clear: mass surveillance programmes based on indiscriminate and blanket collection of personal data are arbitrary per se and can never satisfy the requirements of legality, necessity, and proportionality." "The Nigerian government has a positive obligation to adopt clear laws, effective safeguards, independent oversight mechanisms and accessible remedies to prevent abuse. These duties extend not only to state agencies but also to private actors, including telecommunications providers and technology companies." while purportedly exercising its powers under section 70 of the Nigerian Communications Act, 2003 adopted the 'Lawful Interception of Communications Regulations, 2019 ." "Under Regulation 4, broad discretionary interception powers are granted to the National Security Adviser and the State Security Services, with minimal clarity regarding the scope or limits of such discretion." "The provision also extends to communications within and outside Nigeria and grants blanket immunity to licensees acting 'in good faith.' Such broad and vaguely defined powers create significant risks of abuse, including political misuse." "The inconsistencies in the Regulations create serious legal concerns. Regulation 4 limits interception powers to the National Security Adviser and the State Security Services , and Regulation 12 reiterates this restriction." "However, Regulation 23 on 'Interpretation' expands the category of 'authorised agencies' to include additional bodies such as the Nigeria Police Force, National Intelligence Agency, Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, National Drug Law Enforcement Agency, and any other agency the Commission may designate." "This creates ambiguity and undermines legal certainty. Nigerians cannot reasonably know which authorities are empowered to intercept their communications, making the Regulations unpredictable and prone to arbitrary application and abuse." "By delegating authority to the Commission to expand the list at its discretion, Regulation 23 effectively grants unfettered administrative power, contrary to constitutional guarantees of privacy under Section 37 of the Nigerian Constitution and Nigeria's binding international human rights obligations." "Such regulatory ambiguity threatens the rule of law, weakens accountability mechanisms, and increases the risk of abuse, particularly in politically sensitive contexts or during elections. Clear, narrowly defined statutory limits are essential wherever state authorities are empowered to intrude upon private communications." "Regulation 8 is particularly troubling, as it permits interception without a warrant in situations involving consent, threats to life, or actions in the 'ordinary course of business.' These grounds are overly broad and clearly susceptible to abuse." "Even where warrants are required, applications are made ex parte and without adversarial safeguards. Grounds such as 'national security' and 'economic wellbeing' are insufficiently defined, undermining the principles of legality and foreseeability." "The Regulations also fail to require notification of individuals who have been subjected to surveillance, either during or after interception. Without notification, the ability of individuals to challenge unlawful surveillance is severely undermined." "Private communications form part of individuals' intimate sphere and personal development. In the digital age, protecting these rights requires exceptional vigilance." "The Regulations supposedly establish under Regulation 2 a 'legal and regulatory framework for the lawful interception of communications in Nigeria.'" "Under Regulation 6, intercepted communications may be retained for the duration of an investigation and archived for up to three years. There is no clarity on conditions governing storage, destruction, and oversight of retained data." "Regulation 9 compels disclosure of encryption keys and access mechanisms by licensees and private persons. This provision weakens cybersecurity for everyone and fails to provide safeguards for journalists, lawyers, and human rights defenders whose communications require heightened protection." "Regulations 10 and 11 require licensees to install interception equipment and prohibit services without interception capacity. These provisions effectively discourage privacy-enhancing technologies and undermine secure communications, thereby chilling freedom of privacy, expression and association." "Emergency interception powers under Regulation 12 allow warrantless surveillance on broad grounds, including 'national security' and 'organised crime', without prior judicial authorisation. Vague national security grounds violate the right to privacy.""Regulations 13 to 15 grant extensive powers of entry, seizure, and execution without establishing an independent review mechanism. Likewise, Regulation 19 limits reporting to the Attorney General of the Federation, a political appointee, without independent parliamentary or judicial oversight." "While SERAP acknowledges the government's responsibility to address national security and organised crime, such objectives must be pursued within constitutional and international human rights limits. The Regulations are neither necessary in a democratic society nor proportionate." Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources. Nigerian Lawyers Propose Lesotho Law Society to Conduct NBA Election Amid LawsuitDue to a lawsuit questioning the impartiality of the NBA's upcoming 2026 election, the Nigerian Law Society suggests the Law Society of Lesotho oversee the poll as a neutral body. This proposal aims for an out-of-court settlement and follows a court order halting election preparations. Read more " Corruption and Accountability Concerns in Nigerian PoliticsThis article discusses the pervasive issue of corruption within the Nigerian political landscape, highlighting examples like forged certificates, extra-budgetary spending, and a general lack of accountability. It points to a criminal culture among many politicians, citing examples such as the recent Electoral Act changes. Read more " Nigerian Military Repels Boko Haram, ISWAP Attacks in Borno StateJoint Task Force troops in northeast Nigeria repelled coordinated attacks by Boko Haram and ISWAP fighters on multiple communities in Borno State, including Jakana, Mainok, Konduga, and Marte. Intense fighting resulted in the killing of several insurgents, including commanders, while air strikes targeted fleeing fighters. The military confirmed soldier casualties and damage to some structures. Follow-up operations are ongoing. Read more " Insecurity: They don't care - Isaac Fayose accuses Nigerian govt of neglectNigerian businessman, Isaac Fayose has strongly criticized the federal government over the rising wave of violence, kidnappings, and insecurity across the country, saying leaders are prioritizing political ambitions over citizens' safety. Read more " Singida Black Stars Clears Nigerian Goalkeeper Amas Obasogie of Match-Fixing AllegationsSingida Black Stars SC, a Tanzanian Premier League club, has cleared Nigerian goalkeeper Amas Obasogie of match-fixing allegations following an internal investigation. The investigation, prompted by concerns over recent performances, found no evidence of wrongdoing, allowing Obasogie to resume his career. Read more " Tinubu asked to unmask operators of Nigerian-owned supertanker seized by US Coast GuardThe Independent Security Experts of Nigeria, ISEN, has asked President Bola Tinubu to immediately order an independent investigation into the seizure of a Nigerian-owned supertanker, Skipper, by the United States Coast Guard and the US Navy. Read more " Source: https://ng.headtopics.com/news/serap-sues-nigerian-govt-over-failure-to-withdraw-unlawful-80711777